It is not often that I feel compelled to respond to someone’s comment in an actual post. But a recent comment touches on nun issues that I hear from folks from time to time. I am grateful for those who articulate how they feel about nuns even when it takes the form of respectful criticism. Your feedback is important and helps us nuns to reflect seriously on our ministry and life and on how people perceive us.
Here’s the comment:
I read an article about you way back in March. Quite surprised to hear a nun say she visits a bar. I wonder if Jesus approves of nuns visiting bars? I don’t mean to sound too harsh or negative but nuns are too worldly today, living by them selves, wear no habits. A nun is much more respected when everyone knows who she is by her wearing a habit. Too bad that this had been lost, and of course, since many wear no habits, they no longer get any vocations. God Bless you. ER
Thank you for writing and articulating how you view nuns. I have a number of responses floating through my mind but in the end have more questions than answers. I really want to understand where you are coming from with your observations.
1. I guess one of the first questions I have is what exactly is your understanding of what a nun is? What do you base this understanding on — current or past experiences in church or school, the media, other experiences?
2. Are you familiar with the many different charisms of religious life? Did you know that some communities of nuns were founded to be more contemplative and to dedicate their lives to prayer and sacrifice on behalf of the world? and that other communities were founded to be more active in the world, and to minister to people where they are? and that some are a mix of the two?
3. Why do you wonder if Jesus would approve of nuns visiting bars? Is there something about Jesus that you think would abhor visiting a bar? Is it the drinking of alcohol? or the image of bars as “unseemly” places? When you look at the life of Jesus, how does he show that he would disapprove?
4. The habit issue raises many questions for many people and is probably THE biggest source of critique of nuns (many reasons for this, not least is the very compelling visible symbol that the habit is for many). First, for the sake of clarification, all sisters and nuns wear a habit. However, the wearing of the habit is often assumed, albeit erroneously, to be equivalent to the wearing of a veil and a long, robe-like dress which may or may not include the wearing of a rosary, cross, scapular or other part of the habit. I would like some more insight into this because the Church has approved every single Roman Catholic community of sisters and nuns, including their dress code. Why do you think nuns are more respected when they wear a recognizable habit? Does it matter more than the nun’s living out of her call and mission from God? Do you feel that the habit integral to being a nun?
5. What evidence do you have that “of course, since many wear no habits, they no longer get any vocations”? That is one hefty statement that needs some serious backing up in order to make. The media has been throwing around similar statements and people seem to just assume that it’s true. Where is this information coming from? There are communities that do not wear a recognizable habit that are growing in number, and there are communities that do wear a recognizable habit that are not growing in number. Plus, why are numbers the measure of a religious community?
As nuns, we would do well to reflect on these questions and issues both for our own growth as well as for insight into how we are perceived by those within our Catholic family and the world in general.
As readers of this blog post, please let me know your thoughts on the issues raised here. And to ER herself, again I want to thank you for articulating your thoughts on my blog and giving me pause for reflection. The questions I asked are by no means rhetorical … I do want to better understand where you are coming from and to continue the conversations with you. Sister Julie
Archived Comments
- May 28, 2007 at 10:17 pm
-
Hi Sister Julie, I love your blog — it’s great that you are writing it. I am a youth minister in Connecticut. What I find is that many people have had absolutely no experience with nuns, so they do not know what to expect. I do believe they forget that nuns, and priests for that matter, are real people. Most people do not have the chance to really get to know nuns, and therefore base their opinions and perceptions on stereotypes and misinformation. This is a great dialog, though, and an important one.
- May 28, 2007 at 10:50 pm
-
Hi Sister, I was born pre-Vatican II, but was raised up in the Church post-Vatican II. Most of my elementary school teachers were Religious Sisters of Mercy. I remember them in full habits and then several years later in the “modern” habits. I went to public high school, but to a Catholic college, where nearly all the sisters wore “street clothes” (modest skirts, slacks, dresses etc.). At every moment, in every situation – classrooms, dormitories, restaurants, homes, playgrounds, keg parties, sporting events – everywhere, all of the sisters, regardless of their attire, had my respect. We even had an eighth grade girls sleepover at the convent! Seeing the sisters private rooms with their family photos and them in their pajamas, made them more human and their vocation even more impressive to me. I remain indebted and grateful to all of the sisters (and priests) who taught, inspired, challenged and shepherded me through my formative years. I watched them struggle with the changes in the Church and in the larger society. I admire them and you. Keep up the good work – because it is good work!!! All the best.
- May 29, 2007 at 1:45 am
-
To add my twopennothworth from the other side of the Pond… A priest is still a priest when he or she takes off the collar. Therefore a nun is still a nun (and likewise a monk is still a monk) whether wearing a habit and veil or not.
Some priests are never seen without collar and cassock; that suits their particular style of ministry best. Others only wear the cassock for services, and some don’t even do that, depending on what suits their calling. The same applies to all sorts of religious vocational callings, whether you’re called to be a priest, a reader/deacon or to be a religious – or at least, that’s my interpretation of it.
A thought – if Jesus disapproved of wine and alcohol in general, would we have had His first miracle in Cana?
My final comment is that we go, regardless of our type of calling, into the places where God wants us to witness, following in the example of Christ. That will include bars, pubs, nightclubs, prisons, schools, and so on.
- May 29, 2007 at 5:20 am
-
Sister J, The only nun that I have ever ‘known’, that is met in person and spoken with for any length of time, did not wear a habit. We met on a 5 hour train ride and spoke at length of the bussiness of Religion. Her appearance (in street clothes) did not change her status. She was a professional woman, with a serious vocation, preparing for a conference. For my part, I have always percieved nuns (habited) to be seperate, unapproachable. Our family visited a Catholic Shrine this summer, and my children who attended Catholic School for 7 years were astounded by the number of Religious there. I can honestly say that outside of my visit to the Vatican I have never seen so many habits, nor frocked priests. The kids wanted to know why the nuns dressed like that. I didn’t really know what to tell them except that “this is their uniform”. Anyhow, I suppose my point is that to me the uniform does not make the ‘job’ or the person. A surgeon is no less a doctor for not wearing ‘scrubs’. Our dear friend the priest is no less a priest for drinking, going to bars, or wearing a bathing suit at a pool party. Thus, why should it matter what you as a nun choose to wear? I think in the beginning we were all naked weren’t we?
- May 29, 2007 at 5:53 am
-
Hi Sr. Julie… I attended Catholic grammar school with the first few years of nuns with long flowing habits, and shorter dresses with headdress thereafter. I remember that I felt that it was not right because I “liked” the longer habits. Now, I realize that the negative feelings I had were internal. I was more comfortable with what was established and what I knew. I could recognize the nuns at a glance. I believe that sometimes people don’t want to leave their comfort zone and anything that is changed, throws them for a loop and they do not know how to handle it… but really they do not know how to handle themselves in the company of a nun wearing regular clothes. Maybe people want an obvious indication of when they are in the presence of nuns so that they can make sure they act “properly”; but really, if someone has to do that, then they are not really living their faith.
People have their prejudices, like about alcohol, and decide on their own what is proper for the rest of us. It’s so easy to judge someone else. It’s a way of justifying our own beliefs. I think if they were comfortable and confident in our own beliefs, they would not be compelled to judge others. All Catholics/Christians must reveal ourselves by example and not by passing judgment on others. “They’ll know we are Christians by Our Love”.
- May 29, 2007 at 8:52 am
-
First of all, I agree with you, Sister, about the drinking alchohol. Jesus him self drank it, and I find no problem with sisters enjoying the occasional beer or wine and champane on feast days or other fun occations. Harm springs from execess, not from the thing its self.
I disagree, however, that a nun in habit makes them ‘unaproachable’. If you see a woman in habit, you know that she is a sister, and you can ask her any questions you may have about the religous life, or why she chose it, just because you know that she will be able to provide you with awnsers. If a woman religous is sitting in the same place without a habit ( as in a dress, however modified, and a veil) you have no way of knowing she is a religous woman, and the chance to witness to Christ is lost. I am not saying all religous shouls wear a habit, but I think that the idea that wearing one puts a barrier between them and the world is laughable. Police, army personal, and firefighters dont take off their uniform, because they know that if they did, people needing help would not know to turn to them, it is the same for woman ( or men ) religous.
Out of curiousity, sister, could I have the names of the orders that are growing that do not wear a reconizable habit? I would like to take a closer look at them if they have websites and such. Thanks and God Bless
- May 29, 2007 at 11:07 am
-
In some cases I could see definitely see Martha’s point about habited nuns being unapproachable. For Catholics, it may be great to be able to recognize a nun and ask her about religious life. It may seem laughable to you, but not everyone has had good experiences or any experiences for that matter of nuns. For some people there is an air of mystery about habited nuns and people may truly feel a certain distance because of that. Also, we live in a very diverse world and the habit can mean something to one person and nothing to another. The habit may edify some people and alienate others. People may not even recognize the habit. They could think they are on the bus with a Muslim woman instead of a nun.
Approachability, to me anyways, has everything to do with how one presents oneself and creates a sense of openness and hospitality. Having or not having a habit on is secondary. Nuns are always available to chat with people about religious life, God, the world, whatever. We are no more than a phone call, visit or email away. So if you have questions, we’re there for you, even if some of us are not immediately recognizable.
By “growing” I am referring to congregations who are welcoming vocations, have women in formation, and are seeing some if not all of those women through to final vows. (Simply having a surge in “vocations” is not an indication that the community is growing, though it is an attention-grabber for the media.)
- May 29, 2007 at 11:15 am
-
Sister Julie, I came upon your website last week, and I’ve enjoyed reading it very much. I feel a certain connection to you because we are the same age, and women who grew up in the church. I was ministered to and blessed by knowing a nun in college in Rochester, NY. She did not wear a habit. Before I met Sr. Joan (SSJ) and got involved at St. Mary’s parish in Rochester, I had considered finding a different denomination. My church in Portland, OR that I grew up with seemed boring, stuffy and totally out of touch. Sr. Joan gave the homily every other week at St. Mary’s, and she talked about issues that were relevant to me as a young, Catholic woman. I got to know some of the other sisters in the SSJ order, and they were remarkable, faithful women who ministered to others in their daily lives, whatever their job might be. I’m glad there are many different orders of nuns, because I’m sure the calling to be a nun takes a different path for each person. I’m glad, also, to know that there are those like you and Sr. Joan who are out and living among us, ministering to us in our daily lives.
Shannon S. from Seattle - May 29, 2007 at 11:16 am
-
Great conversation Julie! You’re a strong brave soul to provide a safe space for this discussion. When I was first out in the open about my discernment to religous life, the “fashion question” was often foremost on my interactions with people, although really it is tied with the celibacy question. Vowed religious life is really a radical life choice to live out our baptismal call in a particular and counter cultural way. Some feel called to wear a veil as part of this call, others feel called to wear simple dress. Both are valid, both are needed. I’m wary of conversations about numbers, particularly when lay people make statements that if nuns wore habits again, we’d have loads of vocations. Does it have to be an either/or? Can it be a both/and? Can both be valid? As to the question of numbers, I recently heard a talk by Sr. Joan Chittister who said: “numbers are a Capitalist answer to a Christian question.” There is something to that. Those are my thoughts for now.
- May 29, 2007 at 1:57 pm
-
I too found your blog relatively recently; I believe the choice to wear a long habit with veil is a very personal one, as is the choice to be contemplative or in an order that serves others. I think there are many pre-conciliar people who equate nuns with the long habit and veil. I think there are many people who, for whatever reason, feel habited nuns are unapproachable. I am one who considered entering a convent in high school; I did not, and eventually married and have four children. I have been praying for more religious vocations – and believe the prayers of the faithful are the reason we are beginning to see more vocations. I belong to a social group of Catholic women – the Sisters of Divine Chardonnay. In spite of the name, we are a pretty faithful, prayerful group of women. We pray the Rosary, attend Adoration, discuss our patron saints, and are planning a summer retreat. Our “Mother Superior” is an 81 year old woman we nominated simply due to her “advanced wisdom.” We have learned that many of our sisters have the name “Mary” or “Marie” somewhere in their name. We thought we might have pastel chiffon habits… but Sister Suzanne thought we might be heading over the edge. She’s probably right.
- May 29, 2007 at 6:23 pm
-
I would like to comment that I am not sure that the above orders Julie posted are getting younger vocations. They are getting older vocations. But my question would be how many young adults are coming to orders and staying until vows.
I found, as a young adult, the sisters in formation and leadership didn’t know what to do with me in the order because I was 1/2 to 1/3 of the sisters age (I was mid 20s and they were 65 and older for the most part with maybe a few in their 50s). There was such a huge age gap they didn’t know what to do with someone in their mid 20s. They didn’t know that how I acted as a mid 20 year old was normal (even though they sent me to a counsellor who told them I was acting like a normal mid 20 year old). I was often emotionally and psychologically abused because I wasn’t perfect enough. They wanted me to be a finished product and didn’t give me space to grow. I had to be perfect. Almost like they wanted me to act like I was 60 and I was in my mid-20s. I’m talking about life experience… I have no diagnosable issues that the counsellors the sisters sent me to found. In fact, the counsellor said I was losing myself as a young adult… and after I left the order I have to agree that is what I saw in myself and other young adults who join have happen.
I agree that orders are getting older vocations and sister moms. I even heard my formation director tell me she wanted peers since no one entered around her or her peers left the order (she was in her late 50s).
To me the issue of getting vocations is not about whether an order wears a habit or not. It is about how orders treat their younger new members. Are we respected for who we are? I’ve talked to so many young women in orders who are not respected for being a young adult!
I am divided about the habit myself. I feel that it does make someone recognize you as sister. But many women I know who want to wear the habit (or men who wear cassocks) wear it because the habit gives them a sense of power. If you really talk to them, that is what I hear. I’m sure there are many habit wearing sisters who aren’t that way… but I find young women tend to want that power that I have talked to.
- May 29, 2007 at 6:26 pm
-
Just hopped over from Sr. Susan’s Discerning Woman blog.
When I was young (a soundly post-Vatican II young) I passionately loved the idea of nuns wearing habits — the longer and more flowing, the better. Because it was so darn romantic — nuns suddenly became inscrutable, stern, mysterious forces in their big bad uniforms. You see a nun walking down a street in a habit and boom, you think you know exactly what she’s all about — good handwriting and effortless holiness right up until the moment she dies. Kind of the same way when any young woman puts on a long white dress and a gauze veil, you think “Oh, she’s a bride, she’s in love, she’s getting married, this is the happiest day of her life.” You don’t worry about a bride’s career, about how she met her groom, about whether or not the marriage will last. In fact, you don’t worry about what the bride was doing the day before, or will be doing the day after the wedding. She’s just pure frozen brideness. That, to me, was nuns in big habits — pure frozen holy nun-ness.
Of course, no nuns I knew even wore veils. And to me that just seemed so much darn harder — here were these women with discernible personalities and talents, who clearly had bad hair days and somewhat shaky taste in clothes, who I occasionally ran into at the grocery store — and these were supposed to be our examples of holiness?
If there wasn’t all that flowing cloth surrounding them, then all you could tell about their holiness had to do with their actions. And if they were wearing the same clothes I wore. . . then that might mean that holiness wasn’t a specialized form of living that you don’t really have to struggle towards unless you’ve got the right aesthetic. That might mean that everyone in street clothes, in prosaic dailiness, even, for gosh sakes, in bars — is held to the same standards. And could possibly achieve them. I didn’t like that at all. Holiness was a lot safer and more fun to think about when it came with its own period costume, and stayed safely separate from my world of strip malls and grocery stores. I wanted nuns to get back into their outfits pronto, so I could keep the idea of god at an aesthetically pleasing distance from my life.
As for fewer habits equalling less vocations, I can remember a priest telling my father once, well, if we go to that restaurant, I’ll have to stop by my house and get my collar — I always get a free meal that way. Perhaps fewer habits equal fewer free perks for clergy, and thus a less attractive way of life? Still — I strongly suspect the system of privileges never worked quite the same for sisters.
- May 29, 2007 at 9:25 pm
-
The whole issue of habits / not habits is, by now, entirely moot. For all practical purposes, nuns no longer have a significant role in the American Church. Look at many of the comments to this post — those who knew nuns knew them years ago (they seem to be referring to their education in the 1960s or early 70s). One person writes that she’s met only one nun personally. I am 37 and had the good fortune of being educated by excellent nuns in grade school, but not high school. Most of my contemporaries did not have that and have never met a nun. Most of the children in my parish school have never even seen, let alone met a nun. I agree with you that one can’t judge by numbers — however, there’s no denying that sisters simply don’t have any role at all in the lives of the vast, vast majority of American Catholics. I don’t mean that to be critical, just stating a fact.
However, what I would be critical about is the wholesale abandonment of Catholic education in this country by both women and men religious. Their influence on the American Church was powerful not so much because of their numbers, but because they shaped the religious imagination and culture of generations of Catholics. Their leaving Cathoilic education (almost entirely) has lead to imment collapse of the Catholic school system in this country. A tragic loss — one that has happened in several parts of the country and is happening now in many others.
- May 29, 2007 at 10:22 pm
-
I really enjoy this window into a world I know so little about. I am not a religious person. I guess I’m what you would call “spiritual” – I have my own personal way of connecting with God. My family was sort of Catholic – we were baptised, and went to church every now and then. This was in the 70s, and the one thing I do remember is one of the nuns at our parish. She rarely wore a habit, and was criticized for wearing skirts above the knee. Give me a break! I can’t remember her name, but I do remember that she always had a smile on her face and always had time to talk to everyone. I really appreciate the conversations here and the different views expressed – it’s nice to have more of an understanding of a world I don’t know very much about!
- May 30, 2007 at 8:12 am
-
I do agree that the lack of religous in Catholic schools is a huge blow to the faith. I went to a Catholic school and was taught entireally by lay people, and no attenpt was ever made to encourage vocations. I think that where there are sisters in schools, young people will think of a vocation simply because they know it is an option. There are several orders I know of that have stayed with their traditional work of teaching, and they are doing well with vocations. The Nashville Dominicans, for example, who have been around for over 100 years and have over 200 sisters, last year they welcomed 15 more. The Carmelites of the Most Sacred Heart of Los Angeles, who teach and work in hospitals are doing well, the Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist ( I just went on their retreat and would recommend going to anyone discerning religous life ) The School Sisters of Christ the King, who teach in Lincoln are small, but get along fine, and the School Sisters of St. Francis in Texas.
I think there is a connection between knowing sisters and seeing them on a daily basis ( like in schools) and having vocations. I doubt that there will ever be as many as before Vatican 2, but having no sisters at all, which is sadly approaching reality in some places, would be a huge blow to the church.
- May 30, 2007 at 9:34 am
-
I felt really sad to read the email from the “ex-candidate” who felt that she was not accepted by her order to treated well because of her young age. My heart goes out to her. As a young person myself, I remember being told while discerning that an important part of the process was finding a community who could work well with someone younger and would support my maturation as a young adult and my keeping up relationships with my peers.
I joined my community when I was 22, and we have some younger and some older members in formation. This summer some are celebrating first profession and final profession. There are struggles sometimes being a younger member of the community, but I have most always felt very supported by my sisters. Nobody expects me to be perfect and everybody is patient with me. Sisters have often told me how much they appreciate my viewpoint as a young person and the sense of fun and livliness that I bring. I’ve felt valued and aided to grow far more often than judged or criticized.
I hope all young people can find that and realize that as Sr. Julie said that I surge in numbers doesn’t not always mean “growth” or superiority and that communities even with smaller numbers in vocations can be wonderfully vibrant and alive, welcoming, and supportive of new, younger vocations. I hope ex-candidate can find a place where she feels supported and can grow as well.
- May 30, 2007 at 10:13 am
-
Keeping in mind that the plural of “anecdote” isn’t data, I have two stories.
As to people having less-than-optimal experiences with nuns, that describes the nuns my parents and grandparents knew. So much so that when I came to them, saying I was going to become a Benedictine oblate and possibly discern a vocation with them, my parents tried to force me into hospitalization for cult deprogramming.
When I was discerning a vocation, before I met the Hoopy Frood I’m marrying, I really wasn’t concerned with what a community wore. It just happened that the orders I was looking into were more contemplative, and thus, more cloistered. The primary thing I was thinking about was whether or not their charism matched what I was being called to do, not what they wore.
- May 30, 2007 at 6:26 pm
-
Sister Julie, I am only fourteen years old, but I believe that I have a vocation from God to dedicate my life to Him. When I first discerned my vocation and began searching for the order that would best allow me to serve Him in the manner that He desires, I completely disregarded any order I came across that did not wear a traditional habit. Why is that? I was certainly a modern youth, a product of my less-than-modest generation, and as such I had no experience with traditional nuns in the slightest. The only nun I knew was a very old sister, whom I will call Sister P. Sister P (CSJ) was a teacher at my Catholic grade school for many years, although I never personally was taught by her. She dressed in lay clothes, wore jewelry, and had a pampered little dog that she kept with her. Sister P did not attract me to the religious life in the slightest. This is not to say that she was very mean. In fact, she had a lovely disposition and was a favorite among most of my classmates. But try as I might, I could not think of her as a nun in anything but name alone. I had a similiar experience with priests I knew who wore lay clothes. Without the outward appearence of the simple cassock to express the dignity of the one wearing it, I could hardly muster up the respect that these men are due while they were vested in t-shirts and shorts. And then, just when my modern “Catholic” education had taken it’s toll on me and my soul was in its most pitiful state, God saw fit to rescue this miserable sinner. I was introduced to a group of Canons Regular dedicated to giving glory to God through the 2,000-year old Tradition of the Church. These men wore a traditional habit, and were instantly recognizable as holy men of God. The deep respect I felt for them began as soon as I saw them. Since I have come in contact with these men and traditional Catholicism, my soul is at the most peaceful state in which it has ever existed. Because of my renewed prayer life and the tranquility of my soul, I was able to discern rather quickly my call to God. And so, I embrace the habit that I will one day wear. I embrace the “uniform” of my future profession, the outward sign of the beautiful and happy state that nuns are called to. To clarify, I am only expressing what attracts me so much to the habit. I have read a lot of arguments for why the habit should always be worn, but I will not attempt to reproduce them. I only know what I feel is the will of God, and that, I believe, is that I enter a traditional order that has maintained the habit.
P.S. I have decided to enter the Discalced Carmelite Monastery of the Sacred Hearts in Colorado Springs, CO. Please pray for me!
- May 30, 2007 at 9:23 pm
-
I think that ‘pure frozen holy nun-ness’ is my favorite so far in this conversation.
I read something somewhere about American Pentecostal communities which said that by dressing differently these people were removing themselves from the societal ‘norm’ and thusly were a set of walking assumptions. Good or bad, we represent different things to different people. When you are a representation of a symbol (as are police officers, judges, doctors as well as anyone who looks of a stereotype) you can never really know what that symbol means to the person you are interacting with. Right or wrong, everyone has their base set of assumptions and these assumptions rest on that person’s experiences.
The symbol of the habit is slowly changing because society is changing. Our ideas about the Universe are evolving. If, in 1970, one had said that there were over 10 stars out there that had planets in the same orbit as Earth, that person would have been laughed out of the room. In medieval times, they would be silenced. Things which were considered perfectly natural to do as a parent are now considered brutal and abusive. Our knowledge of the Divine is also evolving. But the symbols are slower. Because they are deeper in our psyche than language. The symbol of the nun’s habit (what ever its origin or meaning) has been in our social conscience for almost as long as we have had Christianity. It mattered then what people wore. A poor person could not, by law, wear the same things as a rich person. We have almost 2000 years of history which we have changed in the last 70 (or so). Symbols just don’t get replaced that fast. Humans are not a species which likes change.
I realize that this has been said in various ways (some in far superior eloquence); however, I find this interesting that it takes up so much energy and is such a divisive issue. I guess it just doesn’t make any sense to me why the One-Who-Made-Everything would really care what you were dressed in if you were doing your best to Honor the Divine. According to Genesis, we weren’t made with clothing and we have shown dubious fashion sense from the fig leave on. It is up to the women (and men) who take on the Call of the Divine to decide what is the best way to honoring that Call.
I just can’t imagine someone who has acted to Honor the Divine all their lives not being counted as a Friend of the Divine because she wore cotton and not wool.
- May 31, 2007 at 8:20 am
-
God told the priests of the old testiment to wear special clothing, so you could always tell one. Why would God do that if He really didn’t care what they wore?
- May 31, 2007 at 1:00 pm
-
I’m loving the quote, Sister Susan … “numbers are a Capitalist answer to a Christian question.”
I too was sorry to read what Ex-Candidate wrote. As a woman who started the religious life journey at 25, I struggled with owning who I was as a twenty-something-year-old and learning religious life from folks who were usually at least twice my age. It wasn’t always easy, but I found many good IHM buds, women who were willing to tangle with the issue with me. I also found men and women my age in other religious communities with whom I could connect with. My prayers are so with you, Ex-C.
- May 31, 2007 at 9:54 pm
-
Great thread. I just have a few comments.
- Sister Julie asked where folks, i.e., the general public, get the idea that nuns must wear veils to be legitimate nuns. Well, one place you hear this is EWTN. They frequently bad mouth nuns who don’t wear a habit/veil and won’t even allow a habitless nun to appear on their station.
- A cute story about religious women wearing headcoverings. A Filipini sister I met (they wear short veils that look almost like bonnets) told me about a trip she made to Lancaster, PA, home of many Amish and Mennonite groups. She was walking around some tourist attraction and a visitor came up to her with a camera asking to take her picture. At first, she was puzzled. Then, when she realized what was happening, she told the woman it would be fine to take her picture but if she was looking for a photo of an bonafide Amish lady, she should look elsewhere. The sister then explained she was a Roman Catholic nun!
- I find this humorous that some folks have grabbed onto Sr. Julie’s comment about drinking beer in a bar. Maybe it’s just me, but I sort of just imagined her going out to some local pub/restaurant, with a friend, for a chat, drink and burger. I didn’t think she sitting on a barstool at some sleeze joint waiting for a pickup. All said and done, Jesus did indeed hang out with a rather shady crowd in some less than desirable places. I guess it really just depends on why you are there.
- Prefer not to say: Thought provoking post!
- June 1, 2007 at 8:33 am
-
I’m interested in reflecting on the word, “growth,” in terms of religious congregations. Growth implies vitality. It is possible to see growth as being an increase in the number of vowed members. It is true that some congregations are seeing a large increase in the numbers of young women choosing vowed membership. At the same time, other congregations are seeing growth in a different kind of way. While the numbers of women seeking vowed membership may remain small—women are still entering and staying, but maybe one or two every few years—these congregations are redefining the notion of vocation. For them, the call is not to focus on replacing themselves with vowed members but to put their energy into nurturing their charism in people who feel a call to this charism, but not only in traditional vowed memberships. They are, in fact, seeing growth in the ways that lay women and men are drawn to these charisms and living them out to create the world that Jesus spoke of throughout his life and ministry.
One congregation that inspires me is the Sisters of St. Joseph of St. Paul, MN. I am a CSJ or a different province, but I appreciate my sisters in St. Paul for the variety of ways they commit themselves to living out our charism of unity and reconciliation, “connecting neighbor with neighbor and neighbor with God,” and to “meet the needs of the times.” Of our 7 provinces, the CSJs of St. Paul are one of the oldest if we just look at median ages. They are also among the most dynamic members in terms of creatively and energetically inviting and offering their charism to an increasingly wide web of women and men. A few examples: They have 318 vowed members (1 novice, 2 candidates) and 98 consociates members with 9 in the candidacy process. They have a growing volunteer service corps for young women, the St. Joseph Workers. On the “support us” link on their website, they first list numerous volunteer opportunities. Their understanding of “development” is not just “send donations,” but it describes a large number of services and ministries, including intercongregational initiatives to support health care and clean water in Africa. One of their youngest members, in her early 30s, has founded a thriving ministry called “Celeste’s Dream,” which offers programs in spirituality and leadership for teenagers.
Ironically, a member told me that a diocesan vocation director once said that she would not send women to their congregation to inquire about membership because “they were no longer bearing fruit.” She meant this only in terms of numbers seeking vows. She did not look at “bearing fruit” as living out the Good News of Jesus, dedication to corporal and spiritual works of mercy, and touching the lives of thousands of people, both locally and globally.
- June 1, 2007 at 10:35 pm
-
To respond to Lily… At that time your clothes made your status. The only way that the priests were to get any recognition, by the ruling party as well as the common person, was to dress as a Holy person. These people were inaccessible to most of the population and had incredibly strict purity laws which forbade human contact much of the time. Although the clothing, the symbol of this Life, is still ingrained in our society, there are a plethora of other ways for someone who is trying to live a Holy life to show that Calling which were not even considered at that time. Just my 2 cents…
- June 2, 2007 at 3:49 am
-
Since I’ve “gone public” with my decision to join the Sisters, one of the most common questions is “will you get/have to wear a habit?” People seem very focussed on that and divided in opinion. To be honest, the idea of not having to decide what to wear each day would suit me just fine, but otherwise I’m not so sure. I work with people experiencing homelessness and often mental illness too and I work with a few fully-fledged Sisters. These older sisters don’t wear habits or any outward sign that they’re Religious while they’re at work and it’s amusing and interesting to me to see how people react when/if they find out. Some are stunned and shocked that such ‘normal’ people could be nuns. Some apologise for using bad language (although once I point out how much one of the sisters swears they don’t worry). And some seem to increase in their ability to trust them. I don’t know what this means about the role of the habit though. I can see that it has some benefits but, in our work, there would be far too many people who, I think, would feel excluded or constrained if the sisters were more “nun-y”. Our society is so multi-cultural and multi-faith that I’d be wary of how the habit would be interpreted and who would feel outside what we do and are. Not sure… but getting to hide my messy hair under a veil does have it’s appeal too!
- June 5, 2007 at 4:32 pm
-
Dear Sister Julie, sorry I haven’t been around much lately. I just have to add my two cents to all of this. In my life time I have had no direct contact with any nuns, until I likely for me came across your blog. On rare occasions I did happen to see those I was able to identify as nuns by the habits they were wearing. On those occasions I was in awe and would never have dared to approach someone I saw as being so holy. Ok, that may have been my own misconception but those were the feelings I had and still have today. Be it right or wrong, I see from the comments here this is a feeling shared by others. You can put me in a brain surgeons garb and it doesn’t mean I will know any more about brain surgery. But take the surgeon out of his outfit and he is still a surgeon. I have gained and learned so much from you both through your ministry on this blog and in our emails. You have been a blessing in my life and in the lives of many others. For all I know when you write these inspirational messages that have helped me so much, you could be sitting at your computer wearing raggedy old jeans, a floppy T shirt and a baseball cap on backwards. I don’t care what you are wearing, I care about the wonderful work you are doing, the blessings you are giving so many. Now as for you going for a beer every once in a while, you go girl. Is wine all that much dis-similar to beer. I can think of one pretty important “Man” that sipped wine on occasion. Now for the seedy bars, would that not be the exact sort of place Jesus might head for. In that, while I am certainly not trying to say all that are within a bar are sinners, but you may find a few there. Sister, you are an inspiration to all. You are admired and loved by many just as you are. Bless you.
- June 7, 2007 at 12:09 am
-
I found out about your website in Catholic Digest, Sister Julie. What a wonderful balance for all the smut and craziness found on the web!
My two cents about the habit.
Historically, habits grew out of the dress of the poor women of the area and time at which the order was founded. That’s why Mother Teresa’s nuns wear saris, and why the Sisters of Charity of Rolling Hills wear slim skirts and pillbox hats (They were founded when Jackie Kennedy was setting the norm for fashion!)
My Congregation’s habit is a simple brown or beige dress and scapular, or a simple suit and blouse, with or without a veil, along with profession crucifix and ring, as appropriate for ministry. If our example in prayer, ministry, and behavior doesn’t identify us as women religious, no amount of yardage can. Anyone can wrap themselves in yards of serge and starched linen, but if the witness of their life doesn’t point to Jesus, then what’s the point?
Peace and all good!
- June 7, 2007 at 10:20 pm
-
My aunt was a non-habit-wearing nun, and sometime in my teens it suddenly occurred to my goth-chic black-eyelinered, Doc Martens-craving self, that her willingness to wear straight, knee-length polyester skirts, orange-colored support hose and those hideous blouses from Sears wasn’t just a fashion disaster — it was also a humbling admission of solidarity with the real poor alive today, who ride buses and shop Big Lots, and disappear into the background with their unremarkably tacky clothes.
That said, I checked out the Discalced Carmelites whom Marie Therese hopes to join, and I have to admit that there is probably a unique form of humility that one learns from having to scrub the floor and wash dishes in full robes.
- September 14, 2007 at 11:44 am
-
I am a RN-I dress as an RN so people know who/what I am. The public thus trusts me and approach me as a RN. The respect due a RN is given to me. A nun in a flower dress wearing earings could be my Aunt Flo. I have no idea what she stands for, represents. I have no idea that she has givern her life to Christ and the Church. Thus she does not get the respect due a nun/sister from me. There needs to be the visible representation of the sisterhood to society to inspire the rest of us. You know the only communities with large numbers of postulants, novices are those who live the authentic religious life and wear a clearly identifiable habit. One enters a convent not to be a nurse, teacher, massage therapist, cosmetologist but rather to be a religious FIRST and witness of God’s love manifested on earth.
- April 26, 2008 at 11:59 pm
-
I want to answer Stephen first. Stephen, you said “A nun in a flower dress wearing earrings could be my Aunt Flo…. she does not get the respect due a nun/sister from me” Stephen, all people should get that respect from you. I assume you are a Christian, though perhaps you are a secular internet surfer. But working on my assumption, do you think Jesus does not want you to respect all people? Shouldn’t you respect all human beings, made in the image of God? Shouldn’t you love your neighbor? If you feel a certain amount of respect for habitted nuns, I challenge you to apply that respect to all that you meet, whether they be the homeless man in rags on the corner, or the white haired lady in a mumu in the grocery store.
Now, admiration is different. I have a strong admiration for those who are able and called to apply their lives to such admirable vocations as being a nun or monk or priest or deacon… etc. The admiration you feel for a nun might be greater than for your Aunt Flo. But even in admiration, I hope and believe that nuns are merely following our Lord Jesus Christ’s will for their life, as members of his most holy Body. And thus, if his will is for you to be a lay RN and for me to be a wife, that is truly no less admirable… Except that in our increasingly secular society being a nun is far less supported and therefore the woman who becomes one is flaunting worldly social custom. However, in the days of the average household having less than two children that we live in, a Catholic mother who has ten children and does not pursue a career outside the home probably recieves as much criticism from the secular world… I hope my words are not too harsh, Stephen, but I would like to challenge your way of thinking of your fellow human beings.
This next comment is to everyone. I am actually not Catholic, though many of my close friends are. I am Anglican (and therefore being a nun is an option for me… though I am engaged so not anymore). I am 22, and a senior in college. My roommate, a 19 year old Catholic sophomore, just realized (95% certain) that she is going ot be a nun. She is going ot complete her education, and then she will have student loans to work off before entering a convent, but she just went on a vocational retreat and has decided. God has been calling her for a few years. I also have another good Catholic friend who has been discerning for years. She is also not sure (she is 22) but she has been lead towards that direction for more years than my roommate and personally I think she is more likely to become a nun than to marry, but I could certainly be wrong. I just wanted to tell you all about them just to say there are more young people out there who are joining the ranks of sisters. In the denominations that have nuns, I think more are being called from our generation than from last generation.
My mother and father are both ex-Catholic. They lived in a highly Catholic area, and my mother specifically found it empty. Do not be up in arms– I do not find it so today. From the stories my parents, especially my mother have told me, and from meeting and being close friends with many Catholics of my own generation, I think that Vatican II was a very good thing. Vatican II happened when my mom was a small child, so even though she grew up post- Vatican II, the adults around her had not. They were adjusting, and not really knowing how. But the girls (and guys) of my generation who grew up Catholic have grown up in a much stronger way. I remember asking my mom several years ago about the differences between the Catholic and Protestant Bible, assuming she’d remember from her youth. She gave a rueful laugh and said “I don’t know– I wasn’t encouraged to read the Bible when I was a Catholic”. In contrast, my friends have been taught the Bible very well growing up, and the Catholic campus ministry holds a Bible study every Sunday night (which I’ve attended a few times).
I guess this part is mainly replying to Maryann, who said that the role of nuns is a moot point in the American church. But I really to predict a resurgence of nuns… not because I think my generation is more religious, necessarily, and not just because of Vatican II. But because my generation is the post- 9/11, violent school shooting, enduring a long war without trusting the government, terrorist fearing generation. Personally, I lost someone to a school shooting, and my fiance was captured in the Middle East. We’re also the escape to the tv, movies, video games, anything to distract us from life generation. We are stressed, anxiety ridden, frenzied to never stop moving (mentally, though not always physically), to never sit in silence because then we’d have to think…
And I think that those in my generation who are blessed enough to let Jesus find them embrace him strongly. And as we let him reveal his will for our life, we will find that it has always been his will for some to be single.Yes, I want to re-iterate that I do not think that my generation is more religious– in fact it is increasingly secular and many of my peers and even some of my family members are very, very antagonistic to God. Many revere the false teaching that religion is the worst thing to have ever happened to humanity. But in this dark and uncertain time that I truly believe is only getting worse, those who find Jesus’s love are becoming more passionate and fervant in their christianity than the last generation.
And as far as growth goes, while I do believe that more young women will join from my generation than from the previous generation (X) I do not think that there will probably be as many as there was maybe 70 years ago. But as I said, those who are finding him in my generation are finding him abundantly. So I do believe that, as long as they can cling to the holy vine, the sisters that join your convents from my generation will bear lots of fruit. After all, in response to the vocation director who wouldn’t send seeking women to the SSJ of St. Paul… new sisters are simply more branches on that section of the vine. It is their lives that produce fruit, not their numbers.